Thursday, 17 December 2015

THE WASTING RACE



INTRODUCTION

The human race has achieved tremendous milestones, particularly after the industrial revolution. Food production, labour specialization, efficient processing and transportation of goods among others were achieved allowing man to better understand and manipulate the environment for his benefit. It is against that background that readers will be shocked by the disparities in food production and consumption throughout the world. The topic of this essay, however, is focused on the food wasting habits of the human race. Humans have totally failed to emulate nature where wastage is negligible.  Humans compete with each other in throwing food in rubbish bins, which food will end up in landfills. The sheer amount of waste from humans is unbelievable and is costly. We are indeed a wasting race.

According to an authoritative report by FAO, almost a third of food produced in the world is wasted, and that translates to about 1.3 billion tonnes of food. The major culprits are the rich and famous, mainly located in the developed world, pursuing an ostentatious living, unashamedly wasting highly processed food, a whopping 222 million tonnes. In America alone food wastage amounts to 40% worth a staggering $48.3 billion. 

Excess food recovered by activists in America

This is despite the fact that 795 million people world wide are suffering from chronic hunger. In Sub-Saharan Africa, of which I am a proud citizen, 23% of the population is hungry.   Furthermore, 23 million of school going children in the sub-region attend school hungry, every day. The region produces only 230 million tonnes of food, meaning that if the developed world could channel the 222 million tonnes of food it dumps in landfills, the food deficit in our region could be easily be eliminated. 

Hunger kills more people in the world than AIDS, Malaria and Tuberculosis combined. In Africa the death toll from hunger can only be rivalled by witchcraft. 

 
A hungry child suffering from acute hunger

 The striking contradictions above make a compelling case for the human race to do something about hunger. Yes, there are reasons why the developing world is failing to feed its inhabitants but the issue here is that if the current food quantities available on earth could be shared equally and responsibly then there would be no one suffering from hunger. This is more pertinent when people are literally throwing food in landfills, oblivious of the cost involved. It will not be accurate to state that all food wastage, especially at retail and consumption stages occurs in the developed world only. Even here in Sub-Saharan Africa affluent members of the society are throwing valuable food in the rubbish bins, despite the fact that they live in the midst of hunger. It is bad behaviour to waste food when other people are hungry. It can easily be called evil when wasting food is done in greater proportions and consistently. Conversely conserving and sharing food is not only good behaviour but is Godliness. 

A man picking grain for his sustenance

When Jesus Christ fed multitudes from only five small loaves of barley bread and two small fish intended for a small boy’s lunch, the remaining food which filled twelve baskets was not thrown away. He personally instructed His disciples to ensure that all the food be conserved. He said, “Gather the pieces that are left over. Let nothing be wasted.” (John 6:12 NIV) When He was teaching his disciples how to pray to the Heavenly Father, there is line where He says, “Give us this day our daily bread”. 

The Great Ancient Egypt became more prosperous when Joseph, after being alerted by God, advised rulers there on the need to meticulously conserve food (grain) for seven consecutive years, without failure, in specially built silos. The trade of scarce grain at firm prices during the ensuing famine which lasted 7 years buoyed the Egyptian economy to greater heights.

When Israelites, the descendants of Jacob, where being led by Moses from Egypt to the Promised Land, some years later, God told them that each and every household would collect manna, a special food, in accordance with their needs: nothing more, nothing less. They were impressed to take portions they needed, and desist from hoarding food. Those who took more than enough were overwhelmed by maggots. Christians and Theologians have deeper interpretations but the above analogy is relevant to our very topic of wasting food, through buying more than the legitimate needs of your household. 

So what is the cost of wasting food?
The costs of wasting food can be categorised as economic, social and environmental. Economic costs relate to the wastage of valuable and expensive resources such as electricity, fertilizers, fuel, pesticides, labour, and capital to grow and rear food, only to throw the same in landfills. It’s literally burning cash. 
The environmental costs emanate from deforestation as farmers continue to expand their plots to meet a fake demand of food (because purchasing managers of retail shops and manufactures continue to order and produce food at a pace where consumers are not consuming the food), depleted water supplies, biodiversity loss, massive fossil fuel consumption. All these things, together with release of methane gas in the atmosphere from decomposing food in landfills, heighten the greenhouse effect which makes the earth warmer causing sudden and dramatic changes to climate. 

The ensuing social upheavals manifest themselves in increased pollution causing deadly diseases like cancer that decimate populations, reduced farmer incomes causing high incidences of poverty, increased social ills as households attempt to adjust to loss of income resulting in outbreak of STIs and increased crimes leading to overcrowded jails,  lost livelihoods and eventually outbreak of civil strife resulting in loss of lives due to civil wars, cross-border armed conflicts, break down of law and order where hope is totally lost and communities progress is derailed, as militias and bandits take centre stage, brandishing machetes and automatic weapons, declaring themselves as governments and rulers of man, by ironically enslaving people and committing heinous crimes that even the most educated and experienced international jurists and barristers will fail to fathom. Such is the cost of habitually throwing food in the rubbish bins!   

The wealthy people should be reminded sternly that the personal cost of throwing food is immeasurable. These people who live like royals should remember the infamous Queen Antoinette of France. Upon being informed by aides at the Royal Palace on the predicament of the malnourished populace, seeking audience with the rulers on the pressing need to obtain the basic cereals to make their daily bread,  she subconsciously retorted, “Let them eat cake.”  That statement, without exaggerating, was a turning point in the famous French Revolution and she eventually lost her head, when the revolutionaries borrowed her head and never returned it back.

The total cost of wasting food in monetary value is conservatively estimated at $2.6 trillion.  

Where is Food Wasted?
Research has shown that food is lost principally at consumption stage both in developed and developing world. In developed countries food is generally plentiful and many households can afford to purchase great quantities of food items. There is a terrible habit of the rich where they continue buying food even if their pantries are full. Shopping as a hobby is inappropriate, however shopping food as a hobby is highly irresponsible. People should buy food quantities they fully utilize. There is also lack of coordination between retail chains and farmers and manufactures leading to overproduction and overstocking at retail chains resulting in food, processed food for that matter, being literally offloaded in landfills – what a waste by this race?
In Sub-Saharan Africa, food is also lost at pre-harvesting, harvesting and post-harvesting stages due to inadequate infrastructure and technology for preservation and value addition. However we reiterate that the main culprits of food wastage in these localities are actually the rich who flaunt their wealth by throwing food in rubbish bins. Even the middle class and low income earners, when they are doing well financially are seen throwing great quantities of food in the rubbish bins, copying the terrible habits of the rich. 
Valuable food being offloaded in landfill
The Pet Dilemma
Dogs and cats of this world are well nourished, when humans are starving. Animals, it would appear, have more rights than humans. During the colonial era in Africa, the colonial master would keep his dog on the front seat of his van, while his worker (servant) was at the back of an open truck, even in extreme weather. Without exaggerating, this was one on the long list of grievances why the war of liberation was waged against colonialism. It symbolized and confirmed extreme segregation, oppression and discrimination in that the dog, a four legged beast, was considered superior to a human or put this way, the master’s dog was treated far much better than a fully grown up African person, who happened to be a parent, and sometimes an heir to the throne of a Kingdom or clan. 

Needless to say that some of black people who replaced the European settlers in the social hierarchy, condemned their fellow workers to the back of the open truck, even in extreme weather. It is very disheartening that some black people are actually no longer allowing their fellow black workers to take refuge at back of the open truck, who then resort to walking, even in extreme weather. This was aptly observed and captured by George Orwell in his legendary political satirical work, The Animal Farm, wherein farm animals after enduring the oppressive and negligent rule of a farm owner, Mr. Jones, revolted and expelled him from the farm, marking the triumphant revolution where all animals were deemed equal, even though pigs were still opinion leaders and therefore makers of laws. However, it was not long when the rest of the animals looked from pigs to humans and from humans and pigs and struggled to locate the pigs, for there was no difference. The pigs have just replaced Mr. Jones in the social hierarchy and were hell-bent in defending and protecting that position for self-benefit, discarding the ethos of the revolution: equality, freedom.




Solutions
The solution is very simple. People should stop wasting food. However, we know old habits die hard. A concerted effort by stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, developmental agents and activists, volunteers, community and religious leaders should redouble their efforts in conscientising society on the need to conserve food for the benefit of all and the well being of earth, the continuity of the human race and sustenance of future generations. Attitudes should change, and people should value food and wastage should be minimized and perhaps eliminated. These attitudes should be inculcated to humans as early as possible, at kindergartens and continuously taught relentlessly until it becomes a culture that food should not be wasted.  People should not throw litter anywhere and appreciate that nature is a living thing which needs care and that the relationship between the human race and nature is symbiotic and reciprocal. Nature cannot be expected to continue giving the human race while humans continue on a binge of squandering resources. It’s unsustainable and will surely come to an end with disastrous consequences to the wasting race- the human race.

Have a merry Christmas and Happy prosperous 2016. Let's remember the less fortunate by stopping food wastage.
 

Monday, 31 December 2012

Spirituality of Investment


During this festive season, when the world is celebrating the birth of a savior and redeemer, Jesus Christ, it will be befitting that we retrace and dedicate his ethos with regard to investment and philanthropy. In articulating the aforementioned the overarching question shall be, is there any relationship between investing and spirituality? The following is extracted verbatim from the unpublished work of Robert Mudzvova entitled, Investment World Demystified©.

The birth of Jesus Christ in Bethlehem
At face value, one would be forgiven to think that spirituality and investment are completely incompatible. The rich are seen as the curse for the poor. Many rich people mistakenly think that the poor are responsible for their impoverishment. The struggle between the poor and the rich started with the advent of capital. There are certain examples I have given in this book which amplify the “heartless” of the rich and the vulnerabilities of the poorest of the poor.

The struggle between the poor and the rich was therefore the subject and scope of the great essay by the godfather of philanthropy, Andrew Carnegie called the Gospel of the Wealth, of which the following was his submission:

“This, then, is held to be the duty of the man of Wealth: First, to set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display or extravagance; to provide moderately for the legitimate wants of those dependent upon him; and after doing so to consider all surplus revenues which come to him simply as trust funds, which he is called upon to administer, and strictly bound as a matter of duty to administer in the manner which, in his judgment, is best calculated to produce the most beneficial results for the community--the man of wealth thus becoming the mere agent and trustee for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves.”

To Carnegie and indeed all the Carnegiests the world over, the rich will, “…but a trustee for the poor; entrusted for a season with a great part of the increased wealth of the community, but administering it for the community far better than it could or would have done for itself.”

However, the theme of this chapter is to draw parallels between spirituality and investing. Were the greatest philanthropists’ motives out of the good of mankind or the fear of hell or both?

The work of Carnegie is drawn from Biblical texts and there are several percepts to support this, “….Angels (in heaven) derive their happiness, not from laboring for self, but for each other”. And the basis for his philanthropy could have been motivated by Jesus Christ himself, when Carnegie asserted that laboring for the good of our fellow human beings was, “the essence of his (Christ) life and teaching.”

Andrew Carnegie, the godfather of philanthropy 
Carnegie laid the foundation of reconciling between the rich and poor by explicitly highlighting the guidelines for “repatriation” of the wealth accumulated by the rich to the poor. The basis for his thoughts and of course, his deeds, was that the rich should, where it is practical to do so, supervise and monitor the distribution of their wealth to the poor, using the wisdom and experience they exhibited when they were accumulating their wealth.

The profound ideas of Andrew Carnegie were indeed applied religiously by John D. Rockefeller Snr. of Standard Oil fame together with his son, John D. Rockefeller Jr. and ably assisted by Fredrick T. Gates. Rockefeller foundation was arguably the first philanthropist organization to be involved in a world-wide organized philanthropy. The main objective of the foundation was and is, “To promote the well being of mankind world-wide.” To the Rockefellers and all those that have benefited from their good cause, the essence of spirituality is abundantly evident.

These were rich servants of God, who had good intentions about the generality of mankind, particularly the poor and the vulnerable, for their wealth came from business acumen and power of investing and not from thievery or acts of evil.

Perhaps the greatest fear of hell was shown by Warren E. Buffet, in Berkshire Hathaway’s 2002 Annual report, where he said, “...Like hell, it easy is to enter and almost impossible to exit.” But it is true to assert that, he who fears hell is in essence obeying the teachings and deeds of Christ. Buffet in the same annual report, on giving his thoughts on corporate governance and corporate disasters which came due to lack of it, he went deeper into the scriptures when he referred to Jesus Christ’s teachings, who in Luke 16:2, said “Give an account of thy stewardship, for thou mayest longer be steward”

So it can be seen that from Carnegie, through to Rockefeller to Buffet and indeed to Bill and Melinda Gates, the notion of investing is evidently linked to spirituality. It is therefore not an irony that Andrew Carnegie the godfather of philanthropy was the second richest man in the world during the peak of his investing career only second to John D. Rockefeller Snr, the one who popularize the idea of wide scale philanthropy. This was in the late 19th century and early 20th century.

A youthful John D. Rockefeller Sr. of The Rockefeller Foundation 

 Today, Warren E. Buffet the greatest investor in living memory and indeed the greatest philanthropist of all time has committed to handover the greater part of his wealth to the Bill and Melinda Gates’ foundation, arguably making it one of the biggest foundations in the world. At the time of committing his wealth to the Gates, Warren was the second richest man, only second to Bill. These great investors had deep rooted beliefs in the teachings and deeds of Jesus Christ and that they were also rich spiritually.

In the Zimbabwe context, there are many philanthropists who have done a sterling job of assisting the poor. Jairos Jiri, for example, opened his house to the physically challenged and today his name is synonymous with empowerment of the physically challenged. We continue to encourage those who are taking care of the orphaned, the widowed, the elderly, the sick, the physically challenged and the poor that they continue on this path, for it is proper and fruitful. God will bless them abundantly. Jesus Christ encouraged us to help the poor and mentioned several times that poor have a right to the Kingdom of God.

Jairos Jiri, Zimbabwean philanthropist who empowered  many physically challenged people 
Giving generously to the vulnerable is as rewarding as successfully reaching the apex of Mount Everest. The fulfillment got is worth it. It is a legacy for real investors to leave for future generations and this shall not deplete their wealth, but shall usher new opportunities for so many investors to flourish and indeed improve the living conditions of mankind.

We thank most sincerely the visitors and readers of this blog. Together we are community wishing and hoping for the betterment of the suffering humankind. Going forward and God willing, these wishes and hopes shall be concretized into tangibles to endure any form of turbulence and machination from the wicked.

Have a Merry Christmas and a blessed and prosperous 2013

God Bless.

I thank you!

Friday, 21 September 2012

What Africans Really Want - Simple but Effective Technologies


Technology is known to be a game-changer when it comes to development. The industrial revolution which saw the complete transformation of agricultural and manufacturing industries in Britain and later in Western Europe, North America and Japan was premised on steam engine technology. That technology enabled a great leap forward of the human race, through enhanced productivity, as man was able to capture and unleash immense energy stored abundantly in water and coal.  The technology gap is a critical factor that explains the difference between economic development and prosperity between the developed and developing countries.

Today rapid technological advancement continues to take place in high income and middle-income countries, while insignificant technological progress is taking place in low-income countries.  This has been the case for centuries, thus condemning citizens of low-income countries to perpetual poverty. Anyone interested in solving the challenges of poverty, hunger and disease in Sub-Saharan Africa should boldly come up with strategies of reducing the yawning technological gap currently existing in the region. It’s true that in this part of the world people lack access to food, reliable electricity, clean water and sanitary facilities, health facilities, reliable transport, enough clothes, including shoes, stable and affordable broadband etc.

There are a lot of suggestions on how this gap can be plugged. Some advocate for technological transfer mechanisms, which allows the sharing of risks and rewards between the technology developer and the recipient country, institution or company. Technological and innovation diffusion proponents also argue that over time an innovation or technology can be passed to all members of the world community, subject to demographic and cultural factors. The other way is for less technologically advanced countries to just import the technology for production. Thus a country in Sub-Saharan Africa would import some earth-moving equipment from a manufacturer in a developed country. This is, however, very costly to Africa because the resources expended are just too much and leave these communities poorer. The foreign exchange used to import these pieces of technology could be used to solve pressing issues like the provision of basic services, including disease prevention and cure. Again the terms of trade are such that the poor countries are losing out. Great amount of raw materials are shipped out, at low prices, determined, it would appear, by the manufactures of the equipment, and not by the producers of the raw materials. When the equipment, made from the same materials bought at rock-bottom prices, and in some cases looted from Africa, is exported back to Sub-Saharan Africa, the cost to the importing countries is often exorbitant, especially in light of available budgets. The premium of value addition offshore is close to profiteering, from the eyes of consumers of technology in Africa.

SOLUTIONS:
Africa today is clamoring for simple but effective technologies across the whole spectrum of life. The technology should talk to indigenous knowledge systems and environmental issues. In fact, the future of Africa lies in these technologies. They are the foundation of further technological development which shall see the continent pushing farther the boundaries of poverty, hunger and disease. So what kind of technologies are we talking about, and which Africa really wants?

1.    Water harvesting technologies- these enable rural, impoverished communities in dry regions to harness the little precipitation they receive to increase the resilience of their food and income-generating projects.

2.    Irrigation technologies- After the water has been harvested, how can rural farmers use the water in the most efficient way possible to increase productivity and income in cost-effective manner?

3.    Water purification technologies- these enable communities to purify water for consumption to reduce water-borne diseases like cholera, dysentery etc.

4.    Food preservation technologies- to assist the rural farmers to preserve agricultural produce, including fruits for longer periods.

5.     Food processing technologies- to add value, rudimentary as it may be, to the produce such that the income generated from their endeavors is enhanced.

6.     Crop and animal breeding technologies- to increase the productivity of crop and animal varieties.

7.    Aquaculture technologies- to enhance fish production to secure a sustainable source of protein supply to the rural and urban poor.

8.      Energy-efficient technologies- these provide energy for the least cost possible to the environment and users, utilizing renewable sources to stem desertification and other effects of climatic change.

9.    Waste management and recycling technologies- to deal with a menace of litter in urban areas and protect the environment and people from pollution.

10.  Farming and mining technologies- motorized equipment for tilling, cultivating, harvesting and storing crops, and simple and effective mining equipment which reduces the siltation and pollution of rivers.

11.  Technologies for Mosquito Mass Destruction (TMMD)- simple, but effective technologies for launching a frontal attack and totally eliminate Anopheles Gambiae in Africa.

12. Latrines and sanitary technologies- to arrest the spread of fatal diseases like cholera, dysentery, typhoid etc in densely populated areas.

13.  Cotton, wool and silk weaving technologies- produce basic garments to cover one’s body, with further processing for those who can afford.

14.  Synthetic fiber technologies- to accelerate the access of people to new clothing, including shoes, and not to rely on the benevolence of others from developed countries, who currently donate old clothes, including undergarments to poor countries.

15. Hide tanning technologies- to process hides from abattoirs for manufacturing of basic   leather products for local consumption and for exporting the surplus, processed products.

16.  Motorized transport- to efficiently move both people and cargo, especially bulky agricultural produce to markets and mineral ore to the processing zones.

17. Construction technologies- to enable people to build decent, yet cost-effective accommodation.

18. Pharmaceutical & health technologies- to harness the indigenous knowledge systems in medicine passed from our forebears to solve health care challenges.

19.  Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)- for conducting research,   e-learning, e-commerce, e-health, e-government and other critical sectors to enhance efficiencies and use technology to broaden access to basic services, especially targeting marginalized communities.

      

Testing a treadle pump in Malawi courtesy of Appropedia (www.appropedia.org)


The above applications are by no means exhaustive but are illustrative of how technology can change lives. Any person, or organization, or government, or NGO, or multilateral institution, or institution of scientific research, higher and/or vocational learning willing and capable to offer practical, simple and effective technologies for Sub-Saharan Africa is encouraged to do so not only for compassionate reasons, but to make money. The economics of these technologies offer huge potential for higher returns. According to one Peter Makwanya, on his article on How Corporates Can aid Rural Technologies, Zimbabwe Independent, August 17, 2012, “Real builders of modern Zimbabwe would be those whose ideas address the needs for economic development and job creation in rural areas and the business sector should play a leading role.”

A Parabolic Solar Cooker- made from waste material can cook delicious food and pasturize  drinking water  - Courtesy of Appropedia 

On his recent visit to Zimbabwe, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, director-general, Dr Jose Graziano Da Silva, emphasized the need to use local knowledge and solutions to tackle local challenges, particularly in areas of food security. His remarks, as reported by The Herald Zimbabwe, 18 July 2012, “Our target is to increase production by between 50 and 70 percent by the year 2050 and this is only possible if we equip the smallholder farmers in particular with information on the use of cheap but effective technologies.”

There is, therefore, an agreement among stakeholders that Zimbabwe and Sub-Saharan Africa’s production challenges can be tackled by simple, cheap, appropriate, practical and effective technologies, for the benefit of those communities. Government intervention in terms of crafting and implementing enabling policies to direct and incentivize role players, which include but not limited to the corporate sector, investors, research institutions, lenders and individuals to increase and intensify their efforts is invaluable. External support to complement local resources is required from developmental partners and philanthropists. 

A simple but effective Greywater Purification System, Ecuador- Courtesy of Appropedia



Thursday, 16 August 2012

IN PURSUIT OF ANOPHELES MOSQUITOES


A humble trickle of water from a wet land, deep into Miombo woodland, in north-western Zambia, heralds the birth of a river system, whose drainage basin (1,390,000 square kilometers) in Africa can only be rivaled by that of the great Nile River. It was within the course of this mystic river that the world would be mesmerized by a natural formation, which exhibits both beauty and terror. Beauty, for the first European explorer to set his eyes on the feature between1854-1856, David Livingstone, remarked “scenes so lovely must have been gazed upon by angels in their flight”. Terror, for the locals who showed the explorer the formation told him that the feature was called, Mosi-a-Tunya, the smoke that thunders. Today, the falls straddling the border between Zimbabwe and Zambia, indeed have two names, one Victoria Falls, after the then Queen of England and Mosi-a-Tunya, its African name known by many generations gone by.
The majestic Mosi-a-Tunya (Victoria Falls) 

It was on a location upstream on the banks of the Zambezi River, some 10 km from the falls, where early European settlers established a colonial outpost in 1897, close to now Livingstone town, Zambia. Majority of them perished due to unknown disease. There lay a graveyard of early settlers who succumbed to the parasite called Plasmodium falciparum which causes malaria. At the heart of the transmission, particularly in Africa, is a type of mosquito called Anopheles gambiae. Malaria transmission is made possible when a female Anopheles mosquito harvest blood from a host, a human who is infected by the parasites which causes malaria. The parasites undergo development within a mosquito, a period ranging from 10-21 days, depending on parasite species, temperature and humidity. It is critical to note that if the mosquito life span is shorter than the period the parasites take to develop to become infectious, then malaria would not be transmitted. In tropical Africa Anopheles gambiae is known to live longer than the 14 day extrinsic incubation period with two tragic consequences for Africans: first it can reproduce many other potential killers, given that it produces eggs in 2-3 days if it can secure sufficient food- human blood and secondly the parasites can fully develop to cause malaria before the end of the life of the Anopheles mosquito.

Anopheles Mosiquito harvesting human blood, courtesy of CDC.

Since 1897 until today, about 115 years later, Anopheles mosquitoes have decimated African population at the scale of 1 million deaths per year, mostly children (every 30 seconds a child dies of malaria) and pregnant women. Simple arithmetic indicates that close to 115 million Africans, excluding the unborn fetuses (God bless the souls of these lives), have succumbed to early deaths caused by treatable and preventable malaria. Prior to 1897 African population had been severely depleted by slavery, which caused deaths and forced removal of people from their ancestral lands. The impact on African communities and suggested remedies of such a tragic episode shall be articulated further in future installments.

But Anopheles mosquitoes are not only resident in Sub-Saharan Africa. These killer mosquitoes were and still prevalent in temperate regions and even in the vicinity of the polar regions. So why is that the malaria epidemic appear to be now concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa, which sub-region contributes between 89-91% of the malaria deaths world-wide? There is no doubt that malaria deaths are linked to national income per capita, wherein there is causal effect relationship between poverty and malaria. Lack of sufficient national health budgets has crippled efforts by African countries to offer comprehensive malaria control programs. Communities in malaria prone areas are usually isolated and have low income to afford medication and transport to ferry the sick to the nearest health institution, which could be 40-60 km away.

There is no doubt in my mind that there is great scope for the world citizens to do more to reduce and ultimately end the bloodshed. If the world managed to eliminate the parasite in other parts of the world, then it can be done in Africa.

Great work has been done so far in malaria control and among the notable initiatives are the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It is proper to highlight that when UN and its partners managed to eliminate the disease in other parts of the world in the 1940s, Africa was conspicuously left out. According to Jeff Sachs the proponent of the global fund mentioned above, “…Africa, alas, was neither part of the programme (to eliminate malaria) at the time, nor a beneficiary of its results until today.”

Africa today calls for a paradigm shift in pursuit of Anopheles mosquitoes. It is agreed that the mosquitoes that cause malaria live longer in Africa and therefore can produce offspring during their life span. Thus a potent approach to prevent malaria is to eradicate Anopheles mosquitoes and not the parasite alone. This might look grotesque, in terms of budgetary requirements, but it can be done. Already the bulk of funds destined for Africa to combat malaria have not put a dent on the death toll, meaning that the issue is not about money but approach.

Every year resources are mobilized to treat same patients who were treated the previous year and that definitely can cause donor fatigue. What is required now is to create a fund called the Global Fund to Eradicate Anopheles (GEFA). That fund will ensure extensive research about the vector and pathogen behavior particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and recommend ways of totally eliminating this insect once and for all. The fund will also superintend, together with governments and communities, practical ways of hunting the anopheles and vanquish it. According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Larval mosquito control for the prevention of malaria in Africa has not been attempted on a large scale.” Why? It would appear Anopheles gambiae has mastered the skill of intimidation. This Anopheles mosquito is highly versatile, for it breeds in numerous small pools of water after a heavy downpour. The larvae develop within a few days, escaping their aquatic environment before it dries out. So for many it is difficult, if not impossible, to destroy the mosquito larvae.  But surely humans, clever as they are, should find ways of finding the larvae and adult mosquitoes wherever they are and just eliminate them before they spread malaria parasites.

If the status quo remains, African children would be forgiven when they conclude that other world citizens are indifferent to their predicament and are not willing to stem the deaths of Africans from treatable and preventable diseases.

The death burden on African families, especially in rural areas, is immense. Death knocks on rural families’ doors as frequent as once a year because disease, hunger and witchcraft stalk them. HIV and AIDS killed a total of 1.2 million souls in Sub-Saharan Africa in 2010 alone, a staggering 67% of the total deaths attributed to the virus world-wide at 1.8 million. About 30 million human beings have since perished due to AIDS since it was discovered, meaning that a crude estimate: 67% of that figure means that almost 20 million Africans lost their lives due to the pandemic.

Witchcraft has resulted in deaths far greater than that of Malaria, HIV AIDS and other diseases, civil wars and hunger combined. The figure is therefore quite scary and is a subject of future conversations.
So for sustainable population growth in Africa and to alleviate the burden of death on African communities, it is wise and therefore recommended to focus on quick wins. It is from these achievements that we can tackle what seem to be insurmountable challenges which lay ahead. A quick win to reduce the death rate in Africa is to eliminate Anopheles gambiae and to grow enough food within the continent. Once hunger and disease have been eliminated, it is easier to fight issues like poverty, illiteracy, infrastructure, etc.

The issue of witchcraft is urgent and African communities know how to tackle that issue. The problem at the moment is that politicians are not empowering communities through appropriate legal frameworks to confront such a social ill. Useless and retrogressive colonial laws imposed by European settlers are still being used to deal with witchcraft cases, often with spectacular failure. African governments should just allow community leaders to deal with witchcraft cases, only intervening to allow the rule of law and to ensure that laid down procedures and processes of prosecuting perpetrators are followed.

The man who “opened” the African interior in the minds of residents of England and Scotland and other western areas, David Livingstone, succumbed to malaria in 1873. His dear wife, Mary, had died earlier, on 27 April 1862, also due to malaria. While the heart (the other remains are interred at Westminster Abbey) of David Livingstone is buried on upper Zambezi, Mary, the daughter of a Southern and Central African missionary, Robert Moffat, is buried at Chupanga, in Mozambique on the lower Zambezi. Their lives and many of Africans were lost due to Anopheles mosquitoes. It is only proper that people outside Africa and Africans themselves join hands and find the way of stopping the deaths which have occurred for so long. The unity between the Livingstones and the locals can be replicated today as we implement the GEFA fund and totally defeat and destroy Anopheles mosquitoes and the protozoan pathogen, Plasmodium falciparum.


David Livingstone statue at Victoria Falls, on the Zimbabwean side; His heart was and is in Africa